Seo-arcade has you covered with a curated summary of the weekly #SEOchat on Twitter in case you missed it. Even though these tweets are packed with information, you can miss them because of how quickly they come and go. I’ve tried to compile and cite all of those remarks. This week, the emphasis is on content optimization that takes both robots and readers into account.
Maddy Osman: A best-selling author and proprietor of an SEO content marketing service, obsessive about the reading experience

A1: If the content needs to be longer, look at adding some bullet points (or expanding on existing points). If the content needs to be shorter, consider creating multiple posts. #SEOChat

Kathryn Lang – hopesmith and dream ign

A1: I consider word count suggestions just an approx. guideline #SEOChat

Pam Portland

A1: Put simply, investigate. There may be page elements, like comments, that are throwing off the ideal word count suggestion. I share more about how, @blgsmth determines the ideal word count for humans in this. @SEJournal article: https://searchenginejournal.com/word-count-seo-importance/441742/…#SEOchat

Maddy Osman

A2: Outline strategy: Opening point with keyword Story H2 with keyword points h3 point 1 – point 5 story h2 with keyword closing CTA #SEOchat

Kathryn Lang – hopesmith and dream ig

A2: I’m encouraged to use the suggested headers rather than adding fun flair. It’s all about the SEO in our world. But I try sometimes. #SEOChat

Pam Portland

A2: Use content optimization tools like

@clearscope and

@fraseHQ to flesh out ideas for topics to include. Don’t forget to add a unique angle on top of this research. You can also do some of your research by analyzing Google search results: https://youtu.be/fphSkNA6RC0#SEOchat

Maddy Osman

A3: I’ve recently switched up my writing process: 1) drop all headers 2) drop in keywords that naturally fit under headers 3) write content to include those keywords under those headers #SEOChat

Pam Portland

A3: The Google robots are constantly trying to be more human-like. I would focus on writing for Humans. #SEOchat

Eric 

A3: For both humans and robots, you want to think about being concise. For the reader, because they’re trying to skim. For the robot, because they’re trying to quickly process information to give recommendations. The Flesh Reading Ease score is a good benchmark. #SEOchat

Maddy Osman

A4: Optimize for people with a recognization towards the robot. #SEOchat

Kathryn Lang – hopesmith and dream ig

A4: I struggle with this. I optimize for the SEO, obv, but I don’t believe the universe is even searching for our content (based on our keyword report). #SEOChat

Pam Portland

A4: Always humans, imo. The next update might change what the robot thinks, but if it’s clear to the user, that will remain valuable.

Eric

A4: It makes more sense to optimize for the human in most situations. Because of Google’s BERT update, analyzing search queries & recommending relevant results is much more contextual now. Strategies like keyword stuffing only get in the way of the reader experience. #SEOchat

Maddy Osman

A5: Once I figured out the software was offering me the exact titles other ppl already used, I just kept them to the point. Maybe a few extra words for kicks and giggles. #SEOChat

Pam Portland

A5: Cut to the chase! Put the main point right at the beginning. Humans can skim and see if they want to click, and robots see that keyword right up front. #SEOchat

Eric

A5: 1. Incorporate keywords thoughtfully 2. Generate ideas with GPT-3 tools 3. Use heading formulas to refine AI-generated ideas 4. Refine with heading analyzer tools (like @CoSchedule’s) 5. A/B test title ideas as social posts Context: https://youtu.be/d6oaBbCds8A#SEOchat

Maddy Osman

A6a: Engaging writing comes from the heart so AIs will never be able to take the place of the human in that process. #SEOchat

Kathryn Lang – hopesmith and dream ig

A6a: Robots could def add value if they could help move content through the approval process, but that’s even more nuanced than writing. #SEOChat #TooMuchWorkWaitingForReview

Pam Portland

A6b: If you’re worried, you may be producing/focused on the wrong content. And honestly? Who really loves writing 200 product descriptions? AI can be great for writer’s block, ideal for doing the bulk of the content research, and providing the bones as a starting point. #seochat

Angie Nikoleychuk

A6a: GPT-3 tools can be great for idea generation — helping spark your creative human energy. @wordtune and @copysmith are great examples of ways AI can supplement your efforts. Learn how to use GPT-3 tools to help you: https://theblogsmith.com/how-to-use-gpt-3/ #SEOchat

Maddy Osman

A7a: I try to stick with the keywords that really do tie to the content. But I often think that a keyword might offer an avenue I didn’t consider as a writer, but could answer a Q for a reader. #SEOChat

Pam Portland

A8: I try to find a unique take to each piece I generate. I once went to a food truck for lunch and came back and wrote a post about its role in a strong local economy. #SEOChat #FishAndChips

Pam Portland

I sincerely hope this overview was useful. If you missed last week’s #SEOchat, you can find it here.